Effects of the Sale of a Business on Employees (Part 1)

Published: 1 Aug 2018
Type: Insight

First published in The Bermuda Chamber Of Commerce, Legal Corner, August 2018

There are generally three different methods for a purchaser to acquire a company’s business. The effects of the sale or transfer on employees will depend on the type of method implemented. In Bermuda there is no equivalent of the UK Transfer of Undertakings Regulations which created a detailed statutory framework for the regulation of automatic transfers of employees, preservation of their terms and conditions upon transfer, unfair dismissal protection from termination for reasons connected with the transfer and comprehensive notification and consultation rights.

The three main scenarios for a business sale typically encountered in Bermuda are as follows. Firstly, a direct share purchase (where Company A purchases the shares of Company B), and, given that there are no changes in the legal identity of the employer, an employee’s employment contract, benefits and statutory rights will remain unaffected. In the scenario where Company A merges with Company B, given that as from the date of the certificate of amalgamation, the two amalgamated companies continue as one with their assets and liabilities remaining unchanged, the effects on the employees in an amalgamation are likely to be similar to those in a share purchase (although note that this point has not yet been tested in Bermuda law).  Lastly, there is also the asset sale, whereby Company A buys the assets of Company B, but there is no transfer of the business as a going concern. In this scenario, there would be no automatic transfer of employments contracts, and the existing employer would be responsible for conducting any redundancy exercise and for severance payments. This scenario potentially allows Company A to ‘cherry pick’ which employees it would like to engage on new terms and conditions but could be open to challenge if, in reality, the sale goes beyond a mere asset sale.

It is therefore important to consider at an early stage of planning, what the objectives of the purchaser are in relation to employees, and how best to achieve these objectives. The key potential issues that employers often fail to properly consider when a business sale or transfer arises are whether (i) employees will automatically transfer over to the new employer, (ii) whether redundancies will be required and who is going to be responsible for those payments, and (iii) the potential restrictions on a purchaser from altering the existing terms and conditions of employment.

The relevant Bermuda statutory provision is Section 5(6) of the Employment Act 2000 (Act) which states as follows:

“Where a business is sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of, the period of employment with the former employer shall be deemed to constitute a single period of employment with the successor employer, if the employment was not terminated and severance pay was not paid pursuant to [the] Act.”

This section of the Act protects continuity of employment upon the sale, transfer or disposal of a business, together with preserving the employee’s terms and conditions. Further to the Act, where an employee who has completed at least one year of continuous employment has their employment terminated (whether upon sale or after), that employee will be entitled to a statutory severance payment.  In this regard, the Act defines “termination of employment” as termination by reason of (i) redundancy or (ii) the winding up or insolvency of employer.

Part 2 of this series will consider the calculation of severance pay, the application of the statutory exception to the obligation to pay severance in a business transfer situation, and steps that can be taken by a purchaser to limit liability for such payments following a sale or transfer.

This note is intended as a high level overview of this topic and there are a number of other issues which will also require consideration on the sale of a business, including immigration and payroll tax issues. Legal advice should always be sought on a case by case basis.

Share
More publications
Bermuda-1024x576-1
1 Jul 2026

A Forest for the Future

A first since the blight, the airport cedar forest is growing tall and standing strong.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
1 Jul 2026

Complied out of business

Firms are complying themselves out of business because compliance no longer matches the evolving sophistication of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

The long game: how Bermuda became the world’s life reinsurance capital

Ask a life insurer in New York, London or Tokyo where the liabilities behind their book ultimately sit and there is an increasingly good chance the answer is a 21-square-mile island in the North Atlantic.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

Record H1’26 Cat Bond Issuance Driven by Rising Sponsor Comfort and Diversified Risk

With H1 2026 officially breaking the record for the most catastrophe bond deals to come to market and settle in the first six months of the year, a key trend driving this momentum is how comfortable sponsors have become with the mechanics of the overall cat bond space. This familiarity has ultimately encouraged a wave of new sponsors to enter the market, according to Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 May 2026

Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.

Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.