The law is silent regarding changed employment conditions due to a pandemic. However, an employer may wish to consider the following points:

  1. Under the Occupational, Health and Safety Act, an employer must, so far as is reasonably practicable, ensure the safety, health and welfare at work of all his employees. Necessary measures must therefore be taken in special circumstances such as a pandemic and when the authorities make regulations to state that the country is in a lockdown, employers must comply with the same and cannot request employees to attend work unless such services are essential and the necessary authorisations are obtained from the authorities to enable the employees to attend their place of work.
  2. The employer has a duty to remunerate its employees and this duty continues during a pandemic. A contract of employment can only be amended by agreement of all the parties and a unilateral amendment by the employer such as a reduction in salary and/or in working hours may be considered to be a termination by the employee which may lead to a case of unjustified dismissal. It should be noted that an employer may require a an employee to work temporarily for a time shorter than that specified in his agreement at a reduced remuneration, subject to the approval of the supervising officer of the Ministry of Labour, Human Resource Development and Training.
  3. In the event an employer is facing financial difficulties due to a situation such as a pandemic, the employer may consider reducing its workforce either temporarily or permanently or close down his enterprise by following the steps relating to the reduction of workforce under the Workers’ Rights Act and this would include:
    • Notification and negotiation with the trade union or workers’ representatives;
    • In case no agreement is reached during such negotiation, notice to the Redundancy Board must be given – no reduction in workforce may be carried out before the completion of the Redundancy Board’s proceedings within 30 days or such prolonged period as may be agreed.
  4. During negotiation with the trade union or workers’ representatives, an employer may, for instance, discuss shorter working hours to cover temporary fluctuations in manpower needs or a request for workers to take half of their annual leaves at the employer’s request.
  5. It is to be noted that the Ministry of Labour, Human Resource Development and Training issued a communiqué on 7 April 2020 to inform employers and employees that in view of the prevailing situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, all the cases referred to the Redundancy Board for determination would be considered on resumption of office after the current lock down is lifted.
Share
X.com LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
Appleby-Website-Mauritius4
11 Jul 2024

Our Environment Our Responsibility

The judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in the matter of Eco-Sud and two ...

The Grand Court clarifies the ordinary rule for damages in temporary deprivation of property cases
14 May 2024

What are the tools to aid the arbitral process to combat the undesirable effects of parallel litigation?

The fundamental aspect of arbitration as an alternative dispute mechanism is that despite parties’...

MAU
29 Apr 2024

Appleby Mauritius Quarter One Newsletter 2024

As we navigate through this dynamic year, Appleby's first Mauritius newsletter of 2024 sees our team...

Corporate
29 Apr 2024

Receivership: an enforcement mechanism for lenders

In a world of business, unforeseen circumstances can often arise that lead a company to financial di...

Dispute Resolution
29 Apr 2024

The JCPC reaffirmed the exception to the bank secrecy rule

Further to the oral judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) on 06 July 2023 a...

Banking & Financial Services
26 Apr 2024

Regulation of Moneylending in Mauritius

Moneylending is a crucial credit device in the world of financial services which plays a significant...

Dispute Resolution
26 Apr 2024

Katra Holdings Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank (Mauritius) Ltd [2024] UKPC 8 - case summary

The Privy Council set aside an appeal challenging a winding up order of a Mauritian company, Katra H...

MAU
26 Apr 2024

Statutory Demands - a Review of Recent Decisions

INSOLVENCY - The bankruptcy division of Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirms the test to determine the...

Corporate
26 Apr 2024

Directors' Duties in the face of insolvency

The duties of directors in relation to companies in Mauritius are laid out under the Companies Act 2...

Dispute Resolution
16 Apr 2024

Absence of assets in Mauritius – not a bar to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgment

On 12 April 2024, the Mauritian Supreme Court confirmed in Hobler v Harker 2024 SCJ 159, that an app...