Fostering Respect: the Importance of Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policies in Bermuda (Part 2)

Published: 18 Feb 2025
Type: Insight

Under the Employment Act 2000 (EA), it is a requirement for an employer to not only have a compliant policy statement against bullying and sexual harassment (the Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy), but to bring it to the attention of its employees.

In this two-part series, we explain how an employer can ensure that they are adhering to the relevant legislative requirements and highlight the potential consequences of not doing so.

In the first article on this topic, we looked at what a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy must contain, and how it must be introduced to employees. In this article, we consider the consequences of not having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy, as well as how an employee can make a complaint under the Human Rights Act 1981 (HRA).

What are the consequences of not having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy?

As stated in our previous article, it is a statutory requirement for an employer to have a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy. Any employer who does not have such a policy, or who does not have a policy which is compliant with the requirements of the EA (as detailed in Part 1), “shall be liable to a civil penalty” (s.10B(6) of the EA).

Under the EA, a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 can be imposed by the Manager of Labour Relations (s.37A of the EA) and a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 can be imposed by the Employment and Labour Relations Tribunal (s.44M of the EA).

Whilst these sums may not sound substantial to many businesses, the reality is that often the lack of a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy will only come to light where there is a complaint before either the Supreme Court, the Employment and Labour Relations Tribunal, or the Human Rights Tribunal. In such circumstances, the absence of a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy can be used to draw adverse inferences about the culture of a company and the conduct of an employer. It may also generate unwanted adverse publicity for the employer.

More importantly, where an employer is able to show that they have taken all reasonable steps in the circumstances to educate and train employees to not engage in such bullying or harassing behaviours (e.g. by providing a Bulling and Sexual Harassment Policy and associated training), then there is a possibility for the employer to legally separate themselves from the perpetrating employee.

Making a complaint under the Human Rights Act

As stated in Part 1 of this series, a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy must include a statement which informs employees of their right to make a complaint under the HRA where sexual harassment has been committed against them.

An employee has “a right to freedom in his workplace from sexual harassment by his employer, or by an agent of his employer, or by a fellow employee, and notwithstanding any requirements in relation to the responsibilities of employers under any other enactment, an employer shall take such action as it reasonably necessary to ensure that sexual harassment does not occur in the workplace” (s.9(3) of the HRA).

Where an employee considers that sexual harassment has taken place against them in the workplace, they can submit a complaint under the HRA to the Human Rights Commission (s.14H of the HRA). Such a complaint can be made orally, electronically or in writing within six months of the incident (however in some cases, a complaint may validly be made up to two years after the incident where there are good reasons for delay and no one will be prejudiced by the delay).

In the event that bullying has a discriminatory element other than sexual harassment, then an employee would also be able to make a complaint to the Human Rights Commission in the same way.

Making a complaint under the Employment Act

Where an employee suffers bullying without a discriminatory element, and an employer does not adequately address the behavior in line with its Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy, or at all, then it could be open to the employee to bring a claim for constructive dismissal under the EA.

An employee can resign and terminate their contract of employment, on a without notice basis, in circumstances “where the employer’s conduct has made it unreasonable to expect the employee to continue the employment relationship, having regard to the employee’s duties, length of service and circumstances” (s.29 of the EA). That employee is deemed to be unfairly dismissed and, such cases, are commonly referred to as constructive unfair dismissal.

The importance of having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy

The purpose of a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy is to eliminate bullying and sexual harassment in the workplace, and to ensure that all employees understand that their company will not tolerate bullying and sexual harassment. By implanting such policies and associated training, employers will be able to reduce the potential for such behaviours occurring.

The potential financial consequences of losing an unfair dismissal or discrimination claim could far exceed $10,000. As such, the risks of not having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy outweigh any potential inconvenience to an employer of implementing one.

First Published in the Bermuda Chamber of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider), February 2025

Share
More publications
Bermuda-1024x576-1
1 Jul 2026

A Forest for the Future

A first since the blight, the airport cedar forest is growing tall and standing strong.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
1 Jul 2026

Complied out of business

Firms are complying themselves out of business because compliance no longer matches the evolving sophistication of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

The long game: how Bermuda became the world’s life reinsurance capital

Ask a life insurer in New York, London or Tokyo where the liabilities behind their book ultimately sit and there is an increasingly good chance the answer is a 21-square-mile island in the North Atlantic.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

Record H1’26 Cat Bond Issuance Driven by Rising Sponsor Comfort and Diversified Risk

With H1 2026 officially breaking the record for the most catastrophe bond deals to come to market and settle in the first six months of the year, a key trend driving this momentum is how comfortable sponsors have become with the mechanics of the overall cat bond space. This familiarity has ultimately encouraged a wave of new sponsors to enter the market, according to Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 May 2026

Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.

Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.