This Note explains that:

1. Security Tokens are “securities” as defined in the Securities Act 2005, in digital format;

2. When STOs are conducted in or from Mauritius, this offering will be subject to the Securities Act 2005 and to any Regulations made thereunder by the FSC, as may be applicable;

3. No Offerings of Security Tokens may be made without the FSC’s prior approval save and except in respect of offerings to the following categories of investors:

(i) Sophisticated Investors;

(ii) Expert Investors;

(iii) Expert Funds;

(iv) Professional Collective Investment Schemes;

(v) Specialised Collective Investment Schemes.

The above-mentioned terms are defined in the Securities Act or in the Securities (Collective Investment Schemes and Closed-end Funds) Regulations 2008.

4. Any person soliciting another person to enter into transactions involving Securities Tokens must hold the appropriate license under the Securities Act 2005 and must ensure compliance with the following non-exhaustive requirements:

(i) Undertaking adequate due diligence regarding the STO;

(ii) Disclosure obligations to clients regarding the STO and risks associated thereto.

5. Investors must ascertain all risks associated to Securities Tokens prior to committing to the same. Any investment in Securities Tokens is at the investor’s own risk and no compensation arrangement exists in Mauritius in relation thereto.

For further information please reach out to Malcolm, Melissa or your usual Appleby contact.

Locations

Mauritius

Services

Corporate

Sectors

Technology & Innovation

Type

Insight

Share
X.com LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
Appleby-Website-Mauritius4
11 Jul 2024

Our Environment Our Responsibility

The judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in the matter of Eco-Sud and two ...

The Grand Court clarifies the ordinary rule for damages in temporary deprivation of property cases
14 May 2024

What are the tools to aid the arbitral process to combat the undesirable effects of parallel litigation?

The fundamental aspect of arbitration as an alternative dispute mechanism is that despite parties’...

MAU
29 Apr 2024

Appleby Mauritius Quarter One Newsletter 2024

As we navigate through this dynamic year, Appleby's first Mauritius newsletter of 2024 sees our team...

Corporate
29 Apr 2024

Receivership: an enforcement mechanism for lenders

In a world of business, unforeseen circumstances can often arise that lead a company to financial di...

Dispute Resolution
29 Apr 2024

The JCPC reaffirmed the exception to the bank secrecy rule

Further to the oral judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) on 06 July 2023 a...

Banking & Financial Services
26 Apr 2024

Regulation of Moneylending in Mauritius

Moneylending is a crucial credit device in the world of financial services which plays a significant...

Dispute Resolution
26 Apr 2024

Katra Holdings Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank (Mauritius) Ltd [2024] UKPC 8 - case summary

The Privy Council set aside an appeal challenging a winding up order of a Mauritian company, Katra H...

MAU
26 Apr 2024

Statutory Demands - a Review of Recent Decisions

INSOLVENCY - The bankruptcy division of Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirms the test to determine the...

Corporate
26 Apr 2024

Directors' Duties in the face of insolvency

The duties of directors in relation to companies in Mauritius are laid out under the Companies Act 2...

Dispute Resolution
16 Apr 2024

Absence of assets in Mauritius – not a bar to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgment

On 12 April 2024, the Mauritian Supreme Court confirmed in Hobler v Harker 2024 SCJ 159, that an app...