In Mauritius, the Securities Act 2005 identifies the specific offences – insider dealing, false trading in securities, market rigging, fraud involving securities and false or misleading conduct. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Stock Exchange of Mauritius are embodied with certain powers which allow them to take actions against an individual and/or legal person. Most importantly, the Financial Services Act 2007 gives the FSC wide powers such as the power of interview, power of search or power to compel disclosure and power to obtain evidence.

For the purposes of investigation, the investigator, who is authorised by the Chief Executive of the FSC, has the power to:

enter any premises, at any reasonable time, used or has been used by the licensee for business purposes;

search for any document or any other thing that is incidental to the investigation and which is also relevant to the investigation;

administer oath, affirmation or declaration;

seize any document (including electronically stored information), article or other thing and/or object that is incidental or relevant to the investigation;

summon any licensee, or its officers, employees and associates, or any witness necessary for the conduct of the investigation.

After completing the investigation, the investigator must submit his report to the Chief Executive of the FSC and if, on application by the FSC, the court finds that a person has committed an act of insider dealing, the court may make an order requesting payment to the FSC of an amount to be determined by the court. The court may order a maximum amount which is equal to the amount found by the court to be the amount of profit that may have been realised or loss avoided by the offender because of the offence. The amount recovered goes into a compensation fund to compensate investors who suffered a loss by the insider dealing.

Share
X.com LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
Appleby-Website-Mauritius4
11 Jul 2024

Our Environment Our Responsibility

The judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in the matter of Eco-Sud and two ...

The Grand Court clarifies the ordinary rule for damages in temporary deprivation of property cases
14 May 2024

What are the tools to aid the arbitral process to combat the undesirable effects of parallel litigation?

The fundamental aspect of arbitration as an alternative dispute mechanism is that despite parties’...

MAU
29 Apr 2024

Appleby Mauritius Quarter One Newsletter 2024

As we navigate through this dynamic year, Appleby's first Mauritius newsletter of 2024 sees our team...

Corporate
29 Apr 2024

Receivership: an enforcement mechanism for lenders

In a world of business, unforeseen circumstances can often arise that lead a company to financial di...

Dispute Resolution
29 Apr 2024

The JCPC reaffirmed the exception to the bank secrecy rule

Further to the oral judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) on 06 July 2023 a...

Banking & Financial Services
26 Apr 2024

Regulation of Moneylending in Mauritius

Moneylending is a crucial credit device in the world of financial services which plays a significant...

Dispute Resolution
26 Apr 2024

Katra Holdings Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank (Mauritius) Ltd [2024] UKPC 8 - case summary

The Privy Council set aside an appeal challenging a winding up order of a Mauritian company, Katra H...

MAU
26 Apr 2024

Statutory Demands - a Review of Recent Decisions

INSOLVENCY - The bankruptcy division of Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirms the test to determine the...

Corporate
26 Apr 2024

Directors' Duties in the face of insolvency

The duties of directors in relation to companies in Mauritius are laid out under the Companies Act 2...

Dispute Resolution
16 Apr 2024

Absence of assets in Mauritius – not a bar to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgment

On 12 April 2024, the Mauritian Supreme Court confirmed in Hobler v Harker 2024 SCJ 159, that an app...