Maximising Efficiency in Fund Termination Through Liquidating Trusts in Mauritius

Published: 12 Apr 2024
Type: Insight

When it comes to terminating a fund licensed under the laws of Mauritius (Company), one of the key responsibilities of the investment manager is strategizing the best approach for disposing of the Company’s securities and assets. This strategy should not only ensure the Company’s liabilities are met but also aim to maximise returns for investors and creditors. An effective method for achieving these goals is by utilising a ‘liquidating trust’ which in effect is a trust created under the Trusts Act 2001.


The trust (hereinafter referred to as ‘liquidating trust’) is created during the process of winding down a business through liquidation. In cases where a fund faces bankruptcy or chooses to liquidate its assets, such trust can be set up to manage and distribute the remaining assets to creditors and stakeholders.

The trustee of a liquidating trust oversees the liquidation process, which involves selling off assets, settling claims, and distributing proceeds based on a predetermined priority scheme. By holding the remaining assets after resolving the Company’s debts and liabilities, the liquidating trust thus serves as a structured mechanism for the efficient winding down of business operations.

The assets and liabilities of the Company are transferred into the liquidating trust, with investors and creditors assuming the role of beneficiaries. Administrators or liquidators may direct the formation of the liquidating trust during fund administration or winding-up procedures.

A liquidating trust agreement, approved by the administrator or liquidator, outlines the asset manager’s duties, powers within the trust, asset administration terms, and proceeds distribution guidelines. The agreement focuses on expediting the liquidation process, ensuring organised asset management, and expeditious distribution of proceeds to trust beneficiaries.

With at least one qualified trustee overseeing operations, a liquidating trust adheres to a strict framework defined by the Trusts Act in relation to trusts. The trustee is responsible for managing assets, distributing available funds, and resolving claims in compliance with the trust’s governing provisions.

Beneficiaries of the liquidating trust include investors and creditors, with distributions following predetermined priorities specified in the Fund’s constitutional documents. The trust terminates upon completing claims reconciliation, asset liquidation, litigation pursuits, and asset distributions as per the trust agreement terms.

Some of the benefits of liquidating trusts include efficient asset management, creditor protection, asset maximisation, professional oversight, closure, and resolution. These trusts offer stakeholders a centralised entity to manage assets, protect creditor interests, maximise asset value, ensure compliance with legal requirements, and facilitate an organised closure of the business.

In conclusion, by making use of a liquidating trust, companies in Mauritius can streamline the liquidation process, safeguard interests of creditors, optimise asset value, and provide stakeholders with closure and finality in a transparent and efficient manner.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Financial-Services
8 Oct 2025

Enforcing Integrity: The UK’s Legal Arsenal Against Market Abuse

The legal concept of market abuse and the twin concept of upholding market integrity are not new as these were prevalent since the 17th century ¹. As a matter of fact, there is a belief that insider dealing was the root cause of demise of the South Sea Company in the 18th century.

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
9 Sep 2025

Dual Remedies Afforded against the Granting of Injunctions

Actis Consumer Grooming Products Ltd v Super-Max Mauritius [2025 SCJ 388]

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
27 Aug 2025

The Mauritian National Budget 2025/2026 - From abyss to prosperity: Rebuilding the bridge to future

On 05 June 2025, Dr Navinchandra Ramgoolam GCSK, FRCP, Prime Minister of Mauritius, in his capacity as Minister of Finance (Minister of Finance) tabled the National Budget for the fiscal year 2025-2026 under the theme “From Abyss to Prosperity: Rebuilding the Bridge to the Future”.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
18 Aug 2025

Mauritius as an Ideal Seat for Arbitration

In one of its recent determinations, the Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirmed a line of decisions which confirmed its support to arbitration, whether international or domestic. These determinations reflect its understanding of the needs of business community, characterised by a marked choice to resolve disputes through a private mechanism to allow existing business relationships to thrive.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
25 Jul 2025

Insider Dealing: A Review of the Treatment in Mauritius, EU and US Federal law

A review of the treatment in Mauritius, the United States and the European Union of the offence of insider trading confirms the contrasting approaches which these jurisdictions have adopted on the issue even though all three jurisdictions share two fundamental concerns namely, (i) the prohibition on an insider to take an unfair advantage by reason of information which he has obtained to the detriment of third parties who are unaware of such information and, (ii) the protection of the integrity of financial markets and investor confidence ¹.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
20 Jun 2025

Professional emails are personal data

Case Commentary – France, Cour de cassation, 18 June 2025, 23-19.022 Professional emails are personal data.

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
11 Jun 2025

Are our Courts tilting towards procedural flexibility?

Case Commentary: R.K.G FRUITS CO LTD v MAERSK (MAURITIUS) LIMITED 2025 SCJ 220. In a significant decision reaffirming the principle that procedural technicalities should not override substantive justice, the Court of Civil Appeal allowed an appeal overturning an interlocutory judgment of the Bankruptcy Division that had dismissed an application to set aside a statutory demand on the basis of a contested board resolution.

Appleby-Website-Technology-and-Innovation
19 Mar 2025

Is Cryptocurrency security - the Mauritian and USA perspectives?

As any of the emerging technologies, cryptocurrency has been disruptive to the market and has challenged regulators globally. Unsurprisingly, it has been commented that “a little more than a decade ago, cryptocurrencies were essentially an academic concept. The idea seemed far-fetched to most people. But that all changed in 2009 with the creation of Bitcoin …/… [today] the world’s cryptocurrency market is worth more than USD 3 trillion …/… there’s no question that crypto is here to stay, and it will undoubtedly continue to disrupt countless industries ”.

IWD Grid Capture
8 Mar 2025

International Women’s Day 2025 roundtable: Rights. Equality. Empowerment.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
28 Jan 2025

Case Commentary: Mulliez H.S.B v Telecel Group SA & Anor 2025 SCJ 31

On 22 January 2025, the full bench of the Court of Civil Appeal in the matter of Mulliez H.S.B v Telecel Group SA & Anor 2025 SCJ 31 decided on the scope of Section 6 of the Court of Civil Appeal Act 1963, also common referred as the “similar purpose application” section. Unsurprisingly, the Court has pathed the way for judicial activism holding that the: “Court would therefore readily intervene, in the absence of any appropriate or adequate legal remedy, where the immediate and urgent intervention of the Court is warranted for the due administration of justice through the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction.”