New labour law tackles bullying and harassment

Published: 11 Feb 2021
Type: Insight

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking, February 2021

A Bill recently passed in the Senate will introduce important changes to the Employment Act 2000 (“the Act”), Bermuda’s key piece of employment legislation, with effect from June 1.

The changes are part of Government’s intended modernisation of labour and employment law.

This article focuses on the new section 10B which will oblige employers in Bermuda to have a written policy statement against bullying and sexual harassment. This policy is required to contain statements to the effect that:

  • every employee is entitled to employment free of bullying and sexual harassment;
  • the employer will make every reasonable effort to ensure that no employee is subjected to bullying or sexual harassment; and
  • details of bullying and sexual harassment complaints should be kept confidential except as necessary for investigating or taking disciplinary measures.

Further, the policy must explain how complaints can be raised and the measures, including disciplinary action, that may be taken against perpetrators of bullying or sexual harassment. It should also set out details of an employee’s right to bring a complaint of sexual harassment under the Human Rights Act 1981.

The employer’s policy must also use definitions of “bullying” and “sexual harassment” that are substantially the same as the following definitions used in the Act:

  • Bullying: “means the habitual display of offensive behaviour intended to harm, intimidate, humiliate, undermine or coerce a person or group of employees and includes, but is not limited to, ostracising, ridiculing, shouting at, threatening, and verbally abusing a person or group of employees”.
  • Sexual harassment: “includes any one or more incidences of any of the following: the use of sexually suggestive words, comments, jokes, gestures or actions that annoy, alarm or abuse a person; the initiation of uninvited physical contact with a person; the initiation of unwelcome sexual advances or the requests of sexual favours from a person; asking a person intrusive questions that are of a sexual nature pertaining to that person’s private life; transmitting sexually offensive writing or material of any kind; making sexually offensive telephone or internet calls or messages to a person; or any other sexually suggestive conduct in circumstances where a reasonable person would consider the conduct to be offensive”.

There are notable elements of these definitions, including:

  • bullying requires the “habitual” display of offensive behaviour, suggesting that a single incident would not amount to bullying;
  • the test for bullying is met only if the effect of the conduct is intentional;
  • it seems that sexual harassment may not require intent; if a reasonable person would consider the conduct to be offensive then it may meet the test, even if the harasser did not intend it as such.

Many employers already have a policy with definitions of these terms. In the case of sexual harassment, the definition may be based on the slightly different definition in the HRA. International groups of companies often design their policy to apply consistently across all countries in which they operate, using definitions which seek to encompass all of the applicable legal obligations in those territories. The requirement to adopt, in substance, the definitions used in the Act could result in these policies needing to be revised.

The aims behind the new law are clearly admirable and, in the main, the prescribed requirements of the employer’s policy are unlikely to be controversial.

However, the new provisions do not create any new substantive remedies for employees. Specifically, there is no discrete claim that an employee can bring if subjected to bullying in the workplace, although bullying may give grounds for the employee to resign and claim constructive dismissal.

Further, even if an employee is subject to sexual harassment contrary to the policy, they will only be able to bring a claim before the Human Rights Commission if their treatment satisfies the definition of “sexual harassment” in the HRA.

However, if an employer contravenes the new section 10B they may be subject to a new civil penalty, a fine of up to $5,000 if imposed by the Government’s Manager of Labour Relations, or up to $10,000 if imposed by the Employment and Labour Relations Tribunal.

Employers will also be subject to a broad obligation to ensure that “procedures are put in place to assist every employee in understanding the policy”. With this in mind, it would be advisable for the policy to set out the expectations on individual staff members, which may vary, for example if they are in a managerial position, and explain how queries can be raised. Employers may also want to consider giving training to employees on bullying and sexual harassment issues.

The new law will raise the profile of bullying and harassment issues in the workplace, even if it doesn’t substantively change the remedies available to employees. Employers without a policy will need to create one for the first time and those that do have one are advised to review their existing procedures.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
2 Oct 2026

Police certificates become part of BMA vetting

Businesses seeking regulatory approval for directors, owners and senior personnel now need to account for an additional documentary requirement.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Oct 2026

Commingling of Risks: The New Flavour of the Cat Bond Market

As catastrophe bond sponsors grow more confident with the asset class, companies are increasingly combining different peril structures within individual transactions, all of which leads Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby, to say that this commingling of risks is becoming the new flavour of the cat bond market.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
22 Sep 2026

BMA Sets Out Phased Path to a Bermuda Insurance Resolution Regime

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has proposed a framework for resolving failing (re)insurers. Boards and executive teams should take note and, where appropriate, take part in the consultation, which closes on 15 December 2026.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
14 Sep 2026

Navigating BMA’s proposed AI guidance note

Now that the Bermuda Monetary Authority has shifted its focus from general principles about artificial intelligence to a concrete, actionable regulatory framework, board and executive teams of financial service companies must take note and decide whether to become involved in the consultative process.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
10 Sep 2026

AI in the Workplace: Emerging Legal Issues for Bermuda Employers

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming part of the modern workplace. It has moved quickly from being an experimental technology to an everyday business tool. Employers are already using AI to draft job advertisements, screen applications, assess candidates, analyse employee performance, monitor productivity and assist with disciplinary and termination decisions. For employers, the attraction is obvious. AI can process large quantities of information quickly, identify patterns and perform tasks that previously required significant human resources. But such widespread application of AI is also giving rise to legal risk as regulators and courts around the world consider what happens when an employment decision is made, or materially influenced, by an algorithm. It is a question that is likely to become increasingly relevant in Bermuda, as the law necessarily catches up with the technology.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 Sep 2026

Capital rich, softening rates, big opportunity: the growth dilemma

After several years of healthy profits, despite some softening, the reinsurance market remains in good shape – if discipline remains. Meanwhile, new and complex risks are emerging, including data centres, offering big opportunities for growth for those willing to take it on. They were some of the takeaways from 10 senior executives from the Bermuda market who met at a roundtable in Monte Carlo.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 Sep 2026

A refusal to stand still

Anchored by regulatory credibility and an unmatched marketplace, Bermuda continues to widen its offering with capital adaptability and innovation, says Brad Adderley, of Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Funds-and-Investment-Services
27 Aug 2026

Late-stage liquidity and the Bermuda fund toolkit

Private-market liquidity once followed an exit. Today, however, it must often be engineered. That matters in Bermuda, where asset management is not only a substantial sector in its own right, but also complemented by Bermuda’s re/insurance and insurance-linked securities market.

Corporate
13 Aug 2026

The limited liability company: ten years on

Nearly a decade after they were first introduced in Bermuda, parties have started to appreciate the benefits offered by limited liability companies — and consequently we have begun to see LLCs used with increasing frequency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
11 Aug 2026

MGAs, capacity and control

Max Tetlow and Cathryn Minors of Appleby examine the forces pushing MGAs toward better alignment and more disciplined capital.