Significant changes to Cayman Islands Trusts Law

Published: 20 May 2019
Type: Insight

The well-established regime for trusts in the Cayman Islands has been improved by significant changes to the Trusts Law (2018 Revision) (Trusts Law) pursuant to The Trusts (Amendment) Law, 2019 (Amendment), gazetted on 15 May 2019. The Amendment is to come into force at a future date by way of a commencement order.


The Amendment furthers Cayman’s reputation as a world class trusts jurisdiction by enhancing the inherent jurisdiction of a Cayman Islands court in relation to the administration of trusts. The changes, brought about as a result of a report by the Cayman Islands Law Reform Commission on Cayman’s trusts law, have the support of Cayman’s Judiciary and Cayman’s STEP branch.

Existing Regime

The primary trusts legislation in the Cayman Islands is the Trusts Law, supplemented by the Fraudulent Dispositions Law and the Perpetuities Law. However, Cayman Islands trusts law is not fully prescribed by statute; trusts established in the Cayman Islands and subject to domestic law are strongly influenced by judicial decisions of the English courts in trust cases as well as the decisions of Cayman Islands courts.

Key Changes under the Amendment

When the Amendment comes into force, the Trusts Law is amended:

  • to replace the definition of “trust corporation” to mean “a body corporate licensed to conduct trust business, with or without restrictions, under the Banks and Trust Companies Law … or registered under that Law as a controlled subsidiary or a private trust company” (s. 2);
  • to include a new section (a) setting out the circumstances in which the Court has jurisdiction to set aside the mistaken exercise of fiduciary power by a trustee and (b) identifying the persons who may apply to the Court to invoke its jurisdiction in those circumstances (s. 64A);
  • to include a definition of “trust litigation” (meaning “litigation invoking the inherent jurisdiction of the Court in relation to the administration of trusts”) and a new section which, in relation to the exercise of the Court’s jurisdiction to approve compromises of trust litigation affecting minor or unborn beneficiaries, replaces the “for the benefit” test with a “not to the detriment” test (ss 2 and 64B);
  • to replace the “for the benefit test” with a “not to the detriment test” in relation to the Court’s jurisdiction to vary trusts (s. 72(1);
  • to extend the protection afforded by reference to “a personal relationship to the settlor” (in the context of the application of foreign laws which may prohibit or not recognise the concept of a trust) to include a personal relationship to any beneficiary (whether discretionary or otherwise) (s. 91(b); and
  • to empower the Court to make rules in order to give effect to the provisions of the Trusts Law, as amended (s. 111A).

The Amendment will bring further clarification and build on Cayman’s already highly regarded Trusts Law.

Should you have any questions, please contact Carlos de Serpa Pimentel or Esmond Brown.

Share
More publications
Website-Code-Cayman-2
5 Feb 2026

Recusal For Apparent Bias Is Not A New Frontier

In Re New Frontier Health Corporation,[1] Justice Doyle decided to recuse himself, such that he would not hear the trial listed to commence weeks later, on the basis that he made findings in his recent Re 51job Inc judgment, as to the reliability and credibility of the same two experts who would give evidence at the New Frontier trial. The New Frontier judgment represents a further endorsement by the Cayman courts of the fundamental maxim that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
4 Feb 2026

The New Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework – Relevance for Cayman Investment Funds

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) Regulations, 2025 (CARF Regulations) came into effect on 1 January 2026 and provide for the collection, reporting and automatic exchange of information on transactions in crypto-assets.  The CARF Regulations will operate in a similar fashion to the existing Cayman Common Reporting Standard (CRS) regime which facilitates the automatic exchange of financial account information.  For information on recent changes to the CRS, please see our December advisory here.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
27 Jan 2026

CIMA Launches Prudential Information Survey for SIBA Registered Persons

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published a General Industry Notice launching a new Prudential Information Survey for Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (SIBA) of the Cayman Islands.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
15 Dec 2025

Aquapoint LP v Fan: Privy Council Confirms Equitable Constraints Can Override Strict Contractual Rights in Cayman ELP Winding Up

In its recent judgment in Aquapoint LP (in Official Liquidation) v Fan,[1] the Privy Council upheld the judgments of the Grand Court and Cayman Islands Court of Appeal (CICA). The ruling confirms that the exercise of strict legal rights under a limited partnership agreement – even one containing detailed contractual terms and “entire agreement” clauses – can nevertheless be subject to equitable considerations in certain circumstances. Where those equitable considerations arise, they may justify the winding up of an exempted limited partnership on the “just and equitable” basis. Appleby acts for the joint official liquidators of Aquapoint; for further details on the background of this case, see Appleby’s previous article here.